It is de rigeuer these days to criticize denominationalism, creeds, doctrines and other trappings of organized religion. I share in making some of the criticisms. But it is no solution to view oneself as an "independent operator" in this Christian walk. For example, how can one practice the discipline of submission to church leadership --as discussed in Heb. 13:17 and elsewhere-- outside of membership in a body of believers? To whom is one accountable and whom is one in turn holding accountable?
-
Unsu...
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 4:57 AMHere is my opinion.
Just because the Epistles give directions on how a church is to be run and how we need to submit to leadership within the church, it does not state that we must be part of an organized church. It also states that we must submit to all secular leadership, but that does not mean that the secular leadership is righteous. It is a description of how an organization needs to run, and how its members need to be together - with all humility, submitting one to another. If you are not a member of such an organization, then that part is not very relevant - but still leaves you with the instructions to submit to all authorities and to submit yourselves to each other.
If you look back thru the history of the people prior to the formation of Israel there was absolutely no discussion of churches. It was (and is) a personal relationship with YHWH that was (and is) the primary focus of Scriptures.
As far as accountable. Even as a member of a church I am accountable only to YHWH. That doesn't mean there aren't rules of submission, but there is only one mediator between God and man - Jesus Christ. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 1:48 AMGeppy: Just because the Epistles give directions on how a church is to be run and how we need to submit to leadership within the church, it does not state that we must be part of an organized church.
That's not credible. After all, all of the early believers became members of the Church. I don't think the writer of Hebrews would have imagined believers that were unattached to a local body.
Geppy: If you look back thru the history of the people prior to the formation of Israel there was absolutely no discussion of churches. It was (and is) a personal relationship with YHWH that was (and is) the primary focus of Scriptures.
But certainly God's will is reflected by the unity and fellowship he demanded of Israel, and later of the Church. A personal relationship with YHWH in no way precludes intimate fellowship with other believers. In fact, Christ continually knit the two concepts together, as he did in his priestly prayer: "THAT THEY MAY ALL BE ONE; even as You, Father, are in Me and I in You, that they also may be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me" [John 17:21, NASB].
Geppy: Even as a member of a church I am accountable only to YHWH.
I think there is a lot of scripture that speaks to believers' accountability to one another. One of the strongest indicators of this accountability is Galations 6:1,2: "Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you too will not be tempted. Bear one another's burdens, and thereby fulfill the law of Christ." If we don't have obligations to one another, I don't understand why this passage is in the bible. -
-
Unsu...
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 6:22 AMRE: Gal 6:1-2
And how does a passage that speaks about assisting a brother in trouble in love speak to accountability? Our "obligation" is to love each other as ourselves and submit ourselves one to another. That is an instruction to all followers of Christ; not to a church. Accountability infers headship and judgment. Only Jesus is the head of the church, and only Jesus and the Father will pass judgment.
RE: unity/fellowship
The church is a far cry different than the fellowship of a community. A closer comparison to the unity and fellowship of Israel is the relationship and life that we have with our neighbors. I am not saying that "intimate fellowship with other believers" is to be avoided; it is a good thing. But that fellowship does not require a church, only a gathering of 2 or 3 in his name. Like possible a dinner of good Christian friends at which we discuss our Lord and the Scriptures.
<Joseph: all of the early believers became members of the Church>
I think you would be hard pressed to come up with evidence for this. I see much gathering of believers together in the NT; sometimes at a church and sometimes as just friends. I'm just saying that our definition of "church" today is different than it was then. Many "churches" today bear little resemblence to what is written of "churches" in the first century.
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 5:51 AMUnfortunately, I think that the term church leadership has become grossly distorted in our times. What should a church leader be? A devouted follower of Christ - yes, we would probably agree. But just as Christ did not come to be served, but to serve, so our leaders should be. It's a difficult thing to be a humble servant when you are a leader. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 10:08 AMThere is only one Christian leader, and is he who is in heaven the others are pretenders and thieves. I think the original Quakers had it right, their churches met without leadership, other then the holy spirit. -
-
Unsu...
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 1:30 PMWho founded the Quakers and established their "no leadership" style? -
-
Unsu...
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 1:33 PMGeorge Fox
Leader.... -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 7:28 PM<George Fox
Leader.... >
I disagree Jesus established it right here:
Mat 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, [even] Christ; and all ye are brethren. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 1:57 AMRicardo: Mat 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, [even] Christ; and all ye are brethren.
Does that verse speak against human authority, or does it speak against prideful titles for Christian servant-leaders?
There are several passages in the New Testament that encourage and instruct leaders on how to exercise authority: by living up to their ordination [1 Tim. 4:14], by willingly and righteously assuming oversight of the flock [1 Pet. 5:2], by consistently preaching the word [2 Tim. 4:2], by rebuking the unruly [1 Tim. 5:20; Tit. 1:11–13], by exhibiting fatherly love [1 Thess. 2:11]. Moreover, we have scripture that explains how we should interact with leaders: by praying that they excel in the word [2 Thess. 3:1], by honoring their labor [1 Tim. 5:17; Heb. 13:7] by rendering to them our obedience [Heb. 13:17]; by receiving the word they minister to us as directly from God [1 Thess. 2:13].
God has vested authority in leaders of His choosing. They are not usurpers; they're His approved under-shepherds. They exhibit His characteristics of love, respect, service, and trust. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 10:31 AM<Does that verse speak against human authority, or does it speak against prideful titles for Christian servant-leaders?>
Jesus said you have one master, even Christ, and all ye are brethren, that is not talking about titles Jesus is talking about authority. We have one authority God who is in heaven, every believer has a direct access to God and no intermediate authority exists, We are all brethren. This is why he was hated by the pharisees and scribes, he removed their authority.
<There are several passages in the New Testament that encourage and instruct leaders on how to exercise authority: by living up to their ordination [1 Tim. 4:14], >
1Ti 4:14 Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery.
I don't see how this should apply to leadership position but to all Christians.
<by willingly and righteously assuming oversight of the flock [1 Pet. 5:2]>
1 Pet. 5:2 The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed:
1Pe 5:2 Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight [thereof], not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind;
Not b constraint, think on that for a moment, Peter is teaching that those of who are elders should feed the flock, what does that mean? it means teaching the word of God, as I am doing for you now. and not by constraint but willingly, means that I do exerise any authority of you but give as you are willing to accept.
< by consistently preaching the word [2 Tim. 4:2]>
2Ti 4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.
Again applies to all beleivers.
<by rebuking the unruly [1 Tim. 5:20; Tit. 1:11–13]>
1Ti 5:20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
1Ti 5:21 I charge [thee] before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality.
With the addition of 1Ti 5:21 you can see that this i a call for all Christians, and not to prefer one before another is a call to equality.
Tts 1:11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
Tts 1:12 One of themselves, [even] a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians [are] alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
Tts 1:13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
Tts 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
To rebuke false doctrine is call for all of us, as you and I are doing now, in rebuking each other the truth is revealled. You'll also note that with the addition of Tts 1:14 that we are not to heed the commandments of men, but of God alone in doing this.
<by exhibiting fatherly love [1 Thess. 2:11]. >
1Th 2:11 As ye know how we exhorted and comforted and charged every one of you, as a father [doth] his children,
Specifically to comfort, exhort, and charge as a father would to his children. This is a call for all who are Christians in how we deal with one another.
< Moreover, we have scripture that explains how we should interact with leaders: by praying that they excel in the word [2 Thess. 3:1]>
2Th 3:1 ¶ Finally, brethren, pray for us, that the word of the Lord may have [free] course, and be glorified, even as [it is] with you:
2Th 3:2 And that we may be delivered from unreasonable and wicked men: for all [men] have not faith.
2Th 3:3 But the Lord is faithful, who shall stablish you, and keep [you] from evil.
Certainly we are called to submit to the authorities of the world, but in perspective with 2Th3:3 and 2Th 3:3 it is God will establish us, not an intermediate or other authority.
<By honoring their labor [1 Tim. 5:17; Heb. 13:7] >
1Ti 5:17 ¶ Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.
1Ti 5:18 For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer [is] worthy of his reward.
This speaks of compensation, teachers and those that are called to labor for the word are worthy of compensation. This doesn't say obey them and submit yourself to them.
<by rendering to them our obedience [Heb. 13:17]>
Hbr 13:17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that [is] unprofitable for you.
This speaks of worldly authorities and confirms that they shall give account for how they have treated you.
by receiving the word they minister to us as directly from God [1 Thess. 2:13].
1Th 2:13 ¶ For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received [it] not [as] the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.
There is no them, they are us. do you not know that Jesus charged the disiples to go out into the world and make disciples of others? Each of has heard the word from another disciple and accepted it as the word of God, and in doing so become disciples ourselves and delivered the word to still others. I say to you that if you do not desire to walk in the authority of Paul , and Peter and yes to be as Jesus himself then you have strayed from the Christian path:
Mat 10:24 The disciple is not above [his] master, nor the servant above his lord.
Mat 10:25 It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more [shall they call] them of his household?
Mat 10:26 Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.
Mat 10:27 ¶ What I tell you in darkness, [that] speak ye in light: and what ye hear in the ear, [that] preach ye upon the housetops.
Mat 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
I shall fear no man, but only he that in heaven, and my counsel is take from mouths of those that believe and have the holyspirit and from my own heart were likewise the spirit dwells, no man stands before a Christian and God, Amen! -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 2:01 AMRicardo: Jesus said you have one master, even Christ, and all ye are brethren, that is not talking about titles Jesus is talking about authority. We have one authority God who is in heaven, every believer has a direct access to God and no intermediate authority exists, We are all brethren. This is why he was hated by the pharisees and scribes, he removed their authority.
Lets look at a passage that demonstrate rather clearly what I mean. Matthew 23:1-12:
"Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay [them] on men's shoulders; but they [themselves] will not move them with one of their fingers. But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments, And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi. But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ. But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant."
Notice how Jesus doesn't allow his disciples to countermand or ignore the authority of the Pharisees; they "sit in Moses' seat" and he expects his disciples obey "whatsoever they bid you." However, he does not want his disciples to follow the vain and hypocritical practices of the Pharisees. One conceit of theirs he highlights: "being called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi." He says that the Pharisees are delighted by the pomp and circumstance attending their positions. He then warns the disciples "be not ye CALLED Rabbi," and "CALL no man your father upon the earth," and still later "neither be ye CALLED masters." This is to contrast the behavior he expects from his disciples with that exhibited by the Pharisees, obviously. But, again, he didn't criticize the Pharisees for holding positions of power, but instead for revelling in them. That is why I think it a fallacy to use this passage to claim Jesus taught against his disciples exercising authority.
After all, if you follow your line of thought to its natural conclusion, you would have to conclude that by "be not ye called Rabbi (teacher)" Jesus meant don't be a teacher. This is flatly contradictory of his commission to the church: "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations... teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you... [Matt. 28:19,20]. No, Jesus obviously expected us to become teachers... to hold the authority that he imparts to teachers.
I think it fair to say Christ did not want us viewing ourselves as "masters," as the world defines the term, but we are given the rule of stewardship (as nicely explified in the parable of the steward, Luke 12:42-48). Stewards exercise authority in their master's absence. In the parable there is positionally a chief steward, who supervises the work of the other manservants and maidservants, and he is accountable for how he treats them.
Regarding the scriptures I cited, I see we don't agree on the reading of 1 and 2 Timothy: I have the traditional understanding that Timothy was a ordained minister of the gospel, and that the emphasis of the epistle is to encourage him in that ministry. I must say my own conversion experience was not comparable to the "laying on of hands of the presbytery," but of course I can't speak for you. I can say, biblically, that the laying on of hands" is exemplified in Acts 13:3 as the act of leaders in the church when they recognize the call on others to a ministerial work. (As an aside, I would ask what you think the "presbytery" is, if it is not the body of leaders of the church?)
I won't be tedious, and try to answer your reading of each scripture... I'll just ask a generally who do you think are the "elders," the "bishops," or the "overseers" mentioned specifically in these passages from 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, and 1 Peter? If every Christian has the same authority to teach, to preach, and to rebuke, why does the bible speak of elders, bishops and overseers?
But may I contradict myself and quibble with your reading Hebrews 13:17 before I close? This is not a reference to civil leaders: the passage in question begins in verse 7, "remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken unto you the word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of their conversation." It is discussing spiritual leaders, IMHO. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 6:05 PM<Notice how Jesus doesn't allow his disciples to countermand or ignore the authority of the Pharisees; they "sit in Moses' seat" and he expects his disciples obey "whatsoever they bid you." However, he does not want his disciples to follow the vain and hypocritical practices of the Pharisees. One conceit of theirs he highlights: "being called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi." He says that the Pharisees are delighted by the pomp and circumstance attending their positions. He then warns the disciples "be not ye CALLED Rabbi," and "CALL no man your father upon the earth," and still later "neither be ye CALLED masters." This is to contrast the behavior he expects from his disciples with that exhibited by the Pharisees, obviously. But, again, he didn't criticize the Pharisees for holding positions of power, but instead for revelling in them. That is why I think it a fallacy to use this passage to claim Jesus taught against his disciples exercising authority.>
How is it a fallacy? Jesus said you have one master and you are all brethren, Jesus taught that we respect the authority of the powers in the world to give on to ceasars what is ceasars. How much more direct does he have to be! What is unclear about, call no man father, neither be called father or master or rabbi? What is unclear about you have one master, even Christ? Matthew 23:1-12 doesn't support your position, quite the opposite it screams out against it. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 7:28 PMIt isn't unclear at all... the context makes it perfectly clear that Jesus is talking about, as I explained. Again, if he condemned BEING a Rabbi when he said "be ye not CALLED Rabbi," Jesus would be contradicting much of the rest of scripture, including his own commission to the disciples that they become teachers. It is clear that Jesus did not intend to contradict scripture.
God gave offices of leadership to the Church. He "gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers" [Eph. 4:11]. If you contend that Jesus wanted no positions of human authority in Churches, you should excise the references to elders, bishops, and overseers from the canon... and you should redact Hebrews chapter 13. I would fear doing so.
-
-
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 9:02 AM>>>>>>>We have one authority God who is in heaven, every believer has a direct access to God and no intermediate authority exists<<<<<
This is not a teaching of Scripture, Ricardo. Jesus acknowledged earthly religious authority; you can't (scripturally, anyway) argue that God is against it.
Also, you neglect the role of the Spirit, which Jesus promised to send to lead the children of God to truth. ("It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us..." as you know from the 'Council of Jerusalem' recounted in Acts.)
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 6:17 PM<This is not a teaching of Scripture, Ricardo. Jesus acknowledged earthly religious authority; you can't (scripturally, anyway) argue that God is against it.
Also, you neglect the role of the Spirit, which Jesus promised to send to lead the children of God to truth. ("It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us..." as you know from the 'Council of Jerusalem' recounted in Acts.)
>
Jesus is the gate, he, the holyspirit and the father are one. Yes it is a biblical teaching it is the foundation of what Christ taught! the good news of kingdom of God, is that you can reconcile with God become a child of God, and have his laws written in your heart, Gone are the days of will worship. Those who are members of the kingdom of God have the holy spirit to councel them:
Mat 23:8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, [even] Christ; and all ye are brethren.
Mat 23:9 And call no [man] your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
Mat 23:10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, [even] Christ.
---
Jhn 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
------
Hbr 7:28 For the law maketh men high priests which have infirmity; but the word of the oath, which was since the law, [maketh] the Son, who is consecrated for evermore.
----
-
-
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 10:43 AM<God has vested authority in leaders of His choosing. They are not usurpers; they're His approved under-shepherds. They exhibit His characteristics of love, respect, service, and trust.
>
<
Jhn 10:7 ¶ Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep.
Jhn 10:8 All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them.
Jhn 10:9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.
Jhn 10:10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have [it] more abundantly.
Jhn 10:11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.
Jhn 10:12 But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.
Jhn 10:13 The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.
Jhn 10:14 I am the good shepherd, and know my [sheep], and am known of mine.
Jhn 10:15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.
Jhn 10:16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, [and] one shepherd.
>
One Shephard! Amen! -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 2:13 AMThe image of an "under-shepherd" is what we get from a reading of 1 Pet. 5: the elders who "feed the flock of God" and are
awaiting the coming of the "Chief Shepherd." There should be no confusion here with the "hireling" from Christ's passage in John 10. That passage is soteriological, and not a denial of the authority of leaders in the church. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 6:56 PM<The image of an "under-shepherd" is what we get from a reading of 1 Pet. 5: the elders who "feed the flock of God" and are
awaiting the coming of the "Chief Shepherd." There should be no confusion here with the "hireling" from Christ's passage in John 10. That passage is soteriological, and not a denial of the authority of leaders in the church>
It doesn't say chief shepard, it says "One" shepherd. Jesus is only gate the only path, the only authority is that voice that speaks the words of the holy spirit, and it is in all believers. Jesus taught and forgave sins, without the authority of the temple and as disciples of Christ we are called to be as he was.:
Mat 10:25 It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more [shall they call] them of his household?
--
Mat 21:23 ¶ And when he was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?
Mat 21:24 And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things.
Mat 21:25 The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him?
Mat 21:26 But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet.
Mat 21:27 And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things.
----
-
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 7:45 PMRicardo: It doesn't say chief shepard, it says "One" shepherd.
Peter wrote: "And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away" [1 Pet. 5:4]. The Greek word he used was "archipoimen" ("archi" meaning "highest" and "poimen" meaning "shepherd"). Check a Greek lexicon, if you don't believe me. The implication is unavoidable. Peter was describing the elders he was addressing as shepherds under the Highest Shepherd. From this, was coined the term "under-shepherds."
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 9:28 AMSo agree that the Quakers are non-biblical because they had a leader (george Fox)? -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 10:39 AM<So agree that the Quakers are non-biblical because they had a leader (george Fox)? >
What I said is that their church gatherings were bibical.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 1:31 PM>>>>>There is only one Christian leader, and is he who is in heaven the others are pretenders and thieves. <<<<<
Then why did Jesus tell Peter, "Feed my sheep?" What was that about, if NOT indicating a need for church leadership on earth after the ascension?
Look at the Bible itself---the Church put it together and preserved it. Jesus never told anyone which books should go into the New Testament or even who should write them. The Church chose the canon; if you can't trust the Church, why do you accept the canon it chose? -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 7:22 PM<Then why did Jesus tell Peter, "Feed my sheep?" What was that about, if NOT indicating a need for church leadership on earth after the ascension?>
We are all called to do this, do you thing Jesus words were just for Peter?
<Look at the Bible itself---the Church put it together and preserved it. Jesus never told anyone which books should go into the New Testament or even who should write them. The Church chose the canon; if you can't trust the Church, why do you accept the canon it chose? >
I don't also read the gnostic gospels as well, in particular the gospel of Thomas. The canon they choose speaks against them, proof to me that the message is under divine protection. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 7:47 AM>>>>>do you thing Jesus words were just for Peter? <<<<<
I think they were for Peter in a singular sense, yes. Jesus didn't speak them to the assembled group. Indeed, he took Peter aside to tell him this alone.
It helps to realize that Jesus grew up in a tradition of religious authority. He went to the Temple to observe the feasts. He was observant. He complained that the Pharisees did not PRACTICE what they preached but he held that their teachings were true. Check out the beginning of Matthew 23, where Jesus tells HIS OWN followers that the scribes and Pharisees sit on Moses' seat, meaning they teach with religious authority. Jesus NEVER told HIS followers to ignore the teachings of legitimate religious authorities. Indeed, his followers kept going to the Temple AFTER the resurrection.
Then there is the example of Paul---Paul writes as a religious authority, an apostle. This would make no sense if early Christians did not recognize religious authorities! -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 10:38 AM< think they were for Peter in a singular sense, yes. Jesus didn't speak them to the assembled group. Indeed, he took Peter aside to tell him this alone.
>
And where does it say that? Jesus never stated any one disciple was charged with establishing his church, this your words being added to the text.
<It helps to realize that Jesus grew up in a tradition of religious authority. He went to the Temple to observe the feasts. He was observant. He complained that the Pharisees did not PRACTICE what they preached but he held that their teachings were true. Check out the beginning of Matthew 23, where Jesus tells HIS OWN followers that the scribes and Pharisees sit on Moses' seat, meaning they teach with religious authority. Jesus NEVER told HIS followers to ignore the teachings of legitimate religious authorities. Indeed, his followers kept going to the Temple AFTER the resurrection.
>
Jesus himself said that they are husband men who fear his coming for the loss of their authority, and the time was that we will not worship at Jeruselm or at the mountain but in spirit.
<Then there is the example of Paul---Paul writes as a religious authority, an apostle. This would make no sense if early Christians did not recognize religious authorities!
>
They all wrote with authority! for indeed we are all the choosen and called of God! The holyspirti that is in you is the same spirit that is in them, to deny this authority is to deny the holyspirit. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sun, September 23, 2007 - 10:35 AM>>>>>And where does it say that?<<<<<<
It says it in John 21, beginning with verse 15.
15 When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I love you." He said to him, "Feed my lambs."
16
He then said to him a second time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I love you." He said to him, "Tend my sheep."
17
He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" Peter was distressed that he had said to him a third time, "Do you love me?" and he said to him, "Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you." (Jesus) said to him, "Feed my sheep."
Clearly, Jesus is talking to Simon and only Simon here. The text is clear that Jesus addressed these words TO Simon, and what's more, he repeats Simon's name. SImon is given a particular mission---to strengthen his brothers The burden of proof must fall on anyone who claims Jesus was talking to anyone other than Simon here.
ANother important passage in this context is Luke 22:31-32
31 "Simon, Simon, behold Satan has demanded to sift all of you {PLURAL} like wheat,
32
but I have prayed that your [SINGULAR} own faith may not fail; and once you [SINGULAR] have turned back, you [SINGULAR] must strengthen your brothers."
In this context, Peter's "brothers" would already be followers of Jesus. Jesus saw that even his own followers would need their faith strenghtened and he charged someone (namely, Peter) to do it.
That's not reading into the text. That's plain reading!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 5:42 PMPerhaps the root of the question is what is the source of spiritual authority, and how does one discern true spiritual authority today?
Peace,
Peter -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 6:19 PM<Perhaps the root of the question is what is the source of spiritual authority, and how does one discern true spiritual authority today? >
Is it a Christian question? I think to be Christian is to accept that Jesus is our authority and the holyspirit. To deny the holy spirit and the teachings of Jesus is to deny Christianity.
-
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 9:07 PMFor clarification, hebrews 13:7 refers to leadership. Jesus outlined thhow much "authority" that leaders would have in Mark 10:42-44 :
"Jesus called them together and said, "You know that those who are regarded as RULERS of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise AUTHORITY over them.
NOT SO WITH YOU. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all."
Jesus NEVER intended for any of us to have "ruling" authority over one another. One of the fruits of the spirit is self control. If our hearts are controlled by the holy spirit, we do not need to attempt to control (rule) over one another.
ephesians 4:11-16 outlines the leaders role in the life of the believer:
"And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers,
for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry,
for the edifying of the body of Christ,
till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting,
but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head—Christ— from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love."
A few things to note. There is only one ministry outlined in the NT...the ministry of reconciliation. Ephesians indicates that our leaders are not primarily responsible for reconciling people to God. They are supposed to train the saints to go out and help unbelievers reconcile with God.
Everyone is not gifted for leadership, but we are all called to the ministry. I view leaders the same way that I view a basketball coach or a college professor. Their role is to equip me to be everything God intended for me to be. However, they do not have the authority to control my time, talent or treasure.
We should assemble together and love one another like family. But we are a kingdom of priest with one ruler...Jesus.
There are way to many denominational rulers who create bylaws in order to "draw away the disciples" of Jesus Christ "after themselves". They would do well to follow the example of John the Baptist in John 3:25-31:
"Then there arose a dispute between some of John’s disciples and the Jews about purification. And they came to John and said to him, “Rabbi, He who was with you beyond the Jordan, to whom you have testified—behold, He is baptizing, and all are coming to Him!”
John answered and said, “A man can receive nothing unless it has been given to him from heaven. You yourselves bear me witness, that I said,
‘I am not the Christ,’ but, ‘I have been sent before Him.’
He who has the bride is the bridegroom; but the friend of the bridegroom, who stands and hears him, rejoices greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice. Therefore this joy of mine is fulfilled.
He must increase, but I must decrease. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sat, September 22, 2007 - 9:47 PMLeaders have teaching authority. Not governing or sacremental authority -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sun, September 23, 2007 - 10:24 AM>>>>>>Leaders have teaching authority. Not governing or sacremental authority.<<<<
It's not clear that these can be separated, especially if sacraments are part of a church's authoritative teaching! -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sun, September 23, 2007 - 1:06 PM"It's not clear that these can be separated, especially if sacraments are part of a church's authoritative teaching!"
What church are you referring to? Denominational authority is based upon rules and traditions made up by men. The catholics have canon law and protestants have constitutions and bylaws. I am personally content with submitting to the royal law of love. Jesus did not give anyone the authority to start new organizations, write new rules, and recruit members who would loyaly follow their dictates.
I am not saying that I am right and you are wrong. It is clear that we both believe in the authority of scripture. If what I am saying is "not clear" I am happy to reason with you from the scripture. -
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sun, September 23, 2007 - 1:16 PM"Feed my sheep" is not synonomous with "rule my sheep". In the NBA the players do not work for the coach, they work WITH the coach FOR the owner. Both the coaches and players submit to the rule of the owner.
-
-
-
Re: What do we make of Hebrews 13:17?
Sun, September 23, 2007 - 8:49 PM<Leaders have teaching authority. Not governing or sacremental authority >
I'll back this up with Paul himself, he came to his faith and position as a disciple of Jesus, without the authority of another man, no apostle kissed his hand or endowed him with authority. His position as a church leader was through the holyspirit, and the authority with which he acted was not his own but the truth of spirit which he delivered. Pauls letters were often times pleading his points, for this very reason, he had not the power to say yay or nay, but had to convince people that his teachings matched the teaching of Jesus, and in doing so had the authority of Jesus. Likewise any of us today who would rebuke another, having the backing of the teaching of Jesus, does so with greater authority then any man appointed to a position of power.
-
-